Complex Partnerships: Self-authorship and Provocative Academic-Advising Practices
Self-authorship is an additional orientation to traditional college student, epistemological, development theories. Facilitation of self-authorship, via academic advising, may help students meet the desired outcomes outlined by the Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education and integrate these abilities into their knowing and decision-making processes. Through investigation of 132 student narratives about advising and selection of academic majors, I examined advising practices that are consistent with Baxter Magolda's (2001) learning partnerships model for self-authorship development. Findings suggest that student decision-making and self-authoring abilities were enhanced by advising sessions that focused explicitly on goal reflection and associated volitional planning. Students benefited from advising in which nonacademic factors were addressed. Implications for practice are discussed.
Relative emphasis: * theory, research, practice
Contributor Notes
Jane Pizzolato is an assistant professor in the Department of Psychology in Education at the University of Pittsburgh (Pennsylvania). In 2004, she was the recipient of a NACADA Student Research Award–Doctoral Degree Level, which was used to help support this study. Readers may contact Dr. Pizzolato at pizzolat@pitt.edu.
*See note on page 4.