Editorial Type: research-article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Mar 2006

Informing, Apprising, Guiding, and Mentoring: Constructs Underlying Upperclassmen Expectations for Advising

and
Article Category: Research Article
Page Range: 46 – 55
DOI: 10.12930/0271-9517-26.1.46
Save
Download PDF

We examined the mental constructs that guide students' expectations for advisor behavior. Through exploratory factor analysis, we identified four factors that underlie students' expectations. Interpretive analysis revealed underlying dimensions reflected by the factors of advisor role and enactment level. Specifically, the first dimension reflected that advisors may be expected to perform as academic and developmental advisor. The second dimension showed a refinement of factors such that each role could be enacted in a generalized or individualized manner. Based on the identified role and enactment level, four constructs were posited to guide students' expectations for advisors: informing, mentoring, guiding, and apprising. Findings suggest that students prefer that advisors display the informing, guiding, and apprising behaviors significantly more than mentoring behaviors.

Relative emphasis: * theory, research, practice

Copyright: © 2006 National Academic Advising Association 2006

Contributor Notes

Kathleen M. Propp (PhD, University of Iowa) is an associate professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the School of Communication at Western Michigan University. Interested readers can reach Dr. Propp at kathy.propp@wmich.edu.

Steven C. Rhodes (PhD, Pennsylvania State University) is the Director of the School of Communication at Western Michigan University. Interested readers can reach Dr. Rhodes at steve.rhodes@wmich.edu.

*See note on page 4.

  • Download PDF