Style Over Substance in Interventions for At-Risk Students: The Impact of Intrusiveness
Academic advisors charged with developing and implementing student success strategies should ask: To what extent is the process of intervention, rather than the nature of any specific intervention, responsible for an influx in at-risk student performance and persistence? Students in varying degrees of academic probation were randomly assigned to one of three intervention strategies that incorporated controlled content but divergent levels of intrusiveness. The most intrusive intervention resulted in higher cumulative grade-point averages and higher retention rates for all students. Students with the highest risk of academic dismissal were the most responsive to the most intrusive intervention.
Contributor Notes
Anthony Molina is a Ph.D. candidate and the Coordinator of Academic Advising for the College of Arts & Sciences at Cleveland State University. Interested readers may contact the senior author at a.molina@popmail.csuohio.edu.
Robert Abelman, Ph.D., is Associate Dean and Director of Academic Advising for the College of Arts & Sciences at Cleveland State University.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Sanda Kaufman for her kind and professional assistance in the early stages of this investigation.