Among the joys of co-editing the NACADA Review is not only deepening our knowledge of academic advising, but in expanding the boundaries of scholarly work within the field. As editors, we are proud to provide a platform for diverse voices, diverse institution types, and diverse methodologies and epistemologies. Issue 5(1) is an excellent example of this mission. It brings together four excellent articles, with each drawing upon a different scholarly tradition.
The issue kicks off with an invited piece from White. In a work that draws upon the history and philosophy of academic advising, White argues that the